Nationally Acclaimed CLE, April '12 in Walnut Creek
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
8:30 a.m. - 4:15 p.m.
Embassy Suites Hotel
1345 Treat Boulevard, Walnut Creek
(1 block from Pleasant Hill BART)
Great Adverse Depositions: Principles & Principal Techniques
6.5 hours CLE credit
High-quality adverse depositions require the conscious and conscientious application of the integrated set of logical cross-examination rules. This seminar wastes no time on entry-level wisdom, code chatter, idiosyncratic war stories, or tired maxims. Instead, using video clips from high-profile cases, it brilliantly teaches how to take adverse depositions as never before … the one, right, logical way: as an intellectually rigorous discipline. |
Thursday, April 26, 2012
8:30 a.m. - 4:15 p.m.
Embassy Suites Hotel
1345 Treat Boulevard, Walnut Creek
(1 block from Pleasant Hill BART)
Attacking the Expert's Opinion
at Deposition (and Trial)
6.5 hours CLE credit
There is one right, logical method with which to effectively attack the adverse expert's opinion at deposition … no matter the area of law, no matter the field of expertise. As never before, this seminar elucidates that logical method and teaches the archetypal set of integrated questions that are at the heart of every great deposition (and every great trial cross-examination) of the witness who – awkward truth be told – has been paid to screw your case theory. |
------------------
Registration: After reviewing – and accepting the cancellation policy below – please register through PayPay ... which also takes major credit cards, if you don't have a PayPal account. You will be sent a confirming email (with some additional information re parking and lunch) from "Robert Musante's Seminars" within 24 hours thereafter.
April 24, 2012
Great Adverse Depositions:
Principles & Principal Techniques
Register by March 26: $255 (a 15% discount)
Register after March 26: $300
|
|
April 26, 2012
Attacking The Expert's Opinion
at Deposition (and Trial)
Register by March 26: $255 (a 15% discount)
Register after March 26: $300
|
|
April 24 & 26, 2012
Both Seminars
Register by March 26: $450 (a 25% discount)
Register after March 26: $600
|
|
Cancellation Policy: Limited space is available and the two January 2012 seminars did sell out. Thus, please understand that any notice of cancellation (i.e., a call to 925-946-9177 or an email to musante@killerdepo.com) sent after Monday, April 16th, will result in a refund of only 50% of the sum that was paid for the cancelled seminar(s). A notice of cancellation sent within 48 hours of the start of a seminar will result in no refund whatsoever for that seminar. Nor is there any refund for a "no-show." [Sending a substitute attendee is, of course, greatly encouraged.]
------------------
AGENDA re
Great Adverse Depositions: Principles & Principal Techniques
8:30 - 10:00 a.m.
- Deposition cross-examination: an intellectually rigorous discipline
- "Battleships" ... the checklist of recurring deposition questions
- 4 nearly-everybody-agrees depo- sition cross-examination rules
- The "Grand Unified Theory" of civil litigation
- Rationale re saving attacks for surprise at trial
- The can't-be-beat argument vs. the stupidest depo. orthodoxy
- "Whack" defined & demonstrated
- 7 advantages: deposition cross-examiner vs. trial cross-examiner
- Introduction of "The Magnificent Seven"
- When to ask leading questions in a deposition
10:00 - 10:10 a.m. Break
10:10 - 11:20 a.m.
- Exceptions to the leading question rule
- When the truth is not nearly enough
- Bluffing deponent into a damaging admission
- Deponent's escapes from answers to leading questions
- Using rhetoric to intensify arguments
- Reasoning questions
11:20 - 11:30 a.m. Break
11:30 - 12:30 p.m.
- Reasoning questions (cont.)
- Firewalling introduced
- Interrogatory-like questions
- "Nail-down" terms
- Enumeration
- Looping
- Identifying a mediocre adverse deposition in only 60 seconds
12:30 - 1:15 p.m. Lunch (on your own)
1:15 - 2:35 p.m.
- Making the implied or hidden express using lexicography
2:35 - 2:45 p.m. Break
2:45 - 4:15 p.m.
- Making the implied or hidden express using logic
- The transfer of information rule & the most common dumb deposition question
- Deposition "crap" defined
- Attacking narrow questions & question-dodging with high school English skills
- Attacking 2 answers in 1 question
- Attacking the "needle & the haystack" answer
- More re "wisdom" of saving attacks for surprise at trial
- Conducting "interviews" vs. taking great adverse depositions
- Coda
4:15 - 5:00 p.m. (optional)
- All remaining questions about the seminar's teaching points will be answered (or, at least, discussed) ... alas, no official CLE credit will be offered for this segment. Those who cannot stay are invited to send their questions to musante@killerdepo.com.
|
AGENDA re
Attacking the Expert's Opinion
at Deposition and (Trial)
8:30 - 10:00 a.m.
• "Mt. Olympus" expert introduced
• Deposition cross-examination logic applied to experts
• When attacks vs. expert should be played at deposition
• The structure of every opinion:
O = R + 2F
• End point opinions & subordinate opinions
• Bedrock finding & bedrock assumptions
• Seminar's case facts explained
• Cross-examiner's critical listening skills
10:00 - 10:10 a.m. Break
10:10 - 11:20 a.m.
• The schematic every-case-forever chart introduced
• Five categories of expert opinions
• Two must-be-asked questions
• Ten types of expert rules
• X and Y factors defined
11:20 - 11:30 a.m. Break
11:30 - 12:30 p.m.
• Scientific rules & Sir Francis Bacon
• Experiential rules (the "trust-me" expert)
• The scope of expert's expertise
• Non-expert rules
• Expert's weighing process
• Cross-examiner's critical listening skills (again)
12:30 - 1:15 p.m. Lunch (on your own)
1:15 - 2:35 p.m.
• Two incredibly important - and easy to master - techniques
• Attacks vs. expert's claims re X factors
• The "certainty scale" and two archetypal arguments
• Six sources of assumptions
• Seven potential flaws re the expert's assumption
2:35 - 2:45 p.m. Break
2:45 - 4:15 p.m.
• Attacking expert's findings derived through expert means
• Attacking expert's findings derived through non-expert means
• Expert's three - and only three - attacks vs. Y factors:
- Relevance
- Not established
- Weight
• Attacking expert's double standard re case/career
• The perfection line of questioning
• Coda: Don't squander the expert's deposition
4:15 - 5:00 p.m. (optional)
- All remaining questions about the seminar's teaching points will be answered (or, at least, discussed) ... alas, no official CLE credit will be offered for this segment. Those who cannot stay are invited to send their questions to musante@killerdepo.com.
|